CHAPTER FOUR: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BENUE STATE AND FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY (FCT)
CHAPTER FOUR
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS OF DATA AND
DISCUSSION
4.1 Introduction
This chapter presents and analyses the
data collected. The analysis is
based on students’ NECO Oral French scores in 2Q00, 2001 and 2002 collected from the two states (FCT and
Benue State) under study. Comparison
is then made on students’ performance according to state and the year under study.
Research
Question 1: What is the
nature of Benue State SS3 students’ and
FCT students’ performances in NECO Oral French examination over the years?
Table 1: Performances of SS3 students
in NECO Oral French in 2000-2002 in
Benue State and FCT Secondary Schools.
Scores in 2000
|
Percent in 2000
|
Scores in 2001
|
Percent in 2001
|
Scores in 2002
|
Percent in 2002
|
40
|
52
|
35
|
30
|
85
|
95
|
40
|
48
|
42
|
30
|
42
|
66
|
8
|
21
|
52
|
44
|
16
|
67
|
7
|
15
|
60
|
45
|
58
|
79
|
15
|
34
|
42
|
41
|
6
|
8
|
18
|
40
|
76
|
59
|
70
|
51
|
16
|
33
|
44
|
80
|
67
|
50
|
40
|
59
|
59
|
38
|
37
|
41
|
31
|
52
|
45
|
34
|
38
|
41
|
41
|
61
|
60
|
49
|
65
|
50
|
42
|
26
|
36
|
23
|
82
|
51
|
39
|
19
|
85
|
42
|
77
|
37
|
21
|
21
|
44
|
45
|
33
|
34
|
40
|
31
|
60
|
47
|
29
|
22
|
19
|
25
|
33
|
43
|
25
|
32
|
|
|
62
|
78
|
17
|
22
|
|
|
76
|
87
|
11
|
13
|
|
|
30
|
44
|
38
|
56
|
|
|
18
|
19
|
76
|
81
|
|
|
26
|
28
|
66
|
72
|
|
|
23
|
21
|
86
|
79
|
|
|
27
|
43
|
36
|
57
|
|
|
76
|
79
|
20
|
21
|
|
|
79
|
75
|
27
|
25
|
|
|
73
|
56
|
57
|
44
|
|
|
43
|
61
|
28
|
39
|
|
|
88
|
65
|
47
|
35
|
|
|
43
|
37
|
74
|
63
|
|
|
38
|
31
|
84
|
69
|
|
|
44
|
32
|
93
|
68
|
|
|
31
|
38
|
51
|
62
|
|
|
56
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
100
|
|
|
417
|
77.65
|
1645
|
99.9
|
1541
|
99.35
|
Scores
in 2000
|
Percent
in 2000
|
Scores
in 2001
|
Percent
in 2001
|
Scores
in 2002
|
Percent
in 2002
|
37
|
30
|
83
|
67
|
4
|
3.0
|
43
|
26
|
98
|
60
|
22
|
14
|
30
|
29
|
67
|
64
|
8
|
8
|
40
|
31
|
72
|
57
|
15
|
12
|
29
|
18
|
61
|
39
|
67
|
43
|
27
|
18
|
53
|
36
|
67
|
46
|
33
|
33
|
1
|
1
|
67
|
66
|
28
|
16
|
96
|
54
|
54
|
30
|
29
|
17
|
89
|
51
|
55
|
32
|
26
|
17
|
62
|
41
|
65
|
42
|
40
|
19
|
90
|
42
|
86
|
40
|
35
|
18
|
69
|
36
|
89
|
46
|
24
|
17
|
39
|
28
|
76
|
55
|
37
|
21
|
59
|
33
|
82
|
46
|
43
|
22
|
64
|
33
|
88
|
45
|
14
|
7
|
93
|
49
|
80
|
43
|
41
|
24
|
64
|
38
|
64
|
3
|
36
|
17
|
89
|
43
|
80
|
39
|
25
|
16
|
77
|
49
|
54
|
35
|
30
|
16
|
76
|
41
|
80
|
43
|
|
|
88
|
50
|
89
|
50
|
|
|
88
|
51
|
83
|
49
|
|
|
71
|
45
|
88
|
55
|
|
|
66
|
42
|
90
|
58
|
|
|
75
|
46
|
88
|
54
|
|
|
78
|
48
|
86
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
100
|
647
|
63.67
|
1868
|
61.24
|
1894
|
74.39
|
The first part of
table 1 shows the students’ performance in Benue State in the years 2000, 2001
and 2002. In 2000, the students’ total score was 417 or 77.65%, in 2001.their
total score was 1645 or 99.93% while in the year 2002, the students total score
was 1541 or 99.35%.
While the second part
of table 1 shows the students’ Oral French performance in the three years under
study in F.C.T. In the year 2000, the students’ total score was 647 or 63.67%.
In 2001 the total score was 1868 or 61.24% and in 2002, their total score was
1894 or 74,39%. The students’ scores and percentages are also shown in the
table.
Research Question
2a: Is there any
significant difference in students’ Oral French performance within FCT in 2000,
2001 and 2002?
Table 2a:
Comparison of FCT students’ performance in NECO Oral French in 2000, with their
performance in 2001; their performance in 2000; with their performance in 2002;
their performance in 2001; with their performance in 2002.
Test
Scores Range
|
No.
of Students in 2000
|
Percentage
|
No.
of Students in 2001
|
Percent
|
No.
of Students in 2002
|
Percentage
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
17
3
-
|
85
1.5
-
|
2
15
9
|
7.7
57.7
34.6
|
4
12
14
|
13.3
40
46.7
|
Total
|
20
|
100
|
26
|
100
|
30
|
100
|
Table 2a shows
FCT students’ performance in NECO Oral French examinations in 2000, 2001 and
2002. A total of 20 students sat for NECO Oral French examinations in 2000. In
that year 2000, 17 candidates or 85% of students that sat for the examinations
scored between 0-40% while only 3 students or 1.5% scored between 41-80%. No
student scored between 81-100% that year. In 2001, 2 students or 7.7% out of a
total of 26 students that sat for the examinations scored between 0-40%, 15
students or 57:7% scored between 41-80% while 9 students or 34.6% scored
between 81- 100. 30 students sat for the same examination in FCT in 2002. 4
students or 13.3% scored between 0-40, 12 students or 40% scored between 41-80
and 14 candidates or 46.7% scored between 8 1-100.
Research Question 2b: Is there any significant difference
in students’ Oral French performance within Benue State in 2000, 2001 and 2002?
Table 3b: Comparison of Benue State students’ performance in NECO Oral French
in 2000, with their performance in 2001; their performance in 2000; with their
performance in 2002; their performance in 2001; with their performance in 2002.
Test Scores Range
|
No. of Students in 2000
|
Percent
|
No. of Students in 2001
|
Percent
|
No. of Students in 2002
|
Percent
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
13
2
-
|
86.7
13.3
-
|
11
20
2
|
33.3
60.6
6.1
|
14
12
5
|
45.1
38.7
16.1
|
Total
|
15
|
100
|
33
|
100
|
31
|
100
|
Table 2b is the Benue State students’
performance in NECO Oral French in 2000, 2001 and 2002. From the table, it is
observed that in 2000
15 candidates or
86.7% scored between 0-40%, 2 candidates or 13.3% scored between 41-80%, while
no candidate scored between 80-100%.
In 2001, a total
of 33 candidates sat for the examinations, 11 candidates or 33.3% scored
between 0-40%, 20 candidates or 60.6% that sat for the examinations scored
between 41-80%, while only 2 candidates or 6.1% scored between 81-100%. 31
candidates sat for NECO Oral French examinations in 2002, 14 candidates or
45.1% scored between 0-40%, 12 candidates or 38.7% scored between 41-80% and 5
candidates or 16.1% out of 31 candidates that sat for the examinations scored
between 81-100%.
Research Question 3: Is there any significant difference
between male and female students’ Oral French performance within each state
over the years?
Table 3:
Comparison of male students’ performance with female students performance
within Benue State and comparison of male students’ performance with female
students performance within FCT in NECO Oral French examinations.
Year
|
State
|
No. of Male Students & Scores
|
No. of Female Students & Scores
|
||||
2000
|
Benue
|
Scores
|
No.
|
Percent
|
Scores
|
No.
|
Percent
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
5
2
-
|
71
29
-
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
8
2
-
|
80
20
-
|
||
|
7
|
100
|
|
10
|
100
|
||
FCT
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
8
2
-
|
80
20
-
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
7
2
1
|
70
20
10
|
|
|
10
|
100
|
|
10
|
100
|
||
2001
|
Benue
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
7
7
2
|
44
44
12
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
3
8
1
|
25
67
8
|
|
16
|
100
|
|
12
|
100
|
||
|
FCT
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
2
7
5
|
14
50
36
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
5
8
4
|
29
47
24
|
|
14
|
100
|
|
17
|
100
|
||
2002
|
Benue
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
5
3
1
|
56
33
11
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
9
6
-
|
60
40
-
|
|
9
|
100
|
|
15
|
100
|
||
FCT
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
-
8
8
|
-
50
50
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
4
3
3
|
40
30
30
|
|
|
16
|
100
|
|
10
|
100
|
Table 3 shows the
Benue State and FCT male and female students performance in NECO Oral French
examinations in 2000, 2001 and 2002. In 2000 in Benue State, 5 or 71 % out of 7
male students scored between O- 40%, 2 or 29% scored between 41 -80% while no candidate,
scored up to 81-100%.
In the same year
in the same state, out of 10 female students that sat for NECO Oral French
examinations, 8 or 80% scored 0-40% and 2 or 20% scored between 41-80%. No
candidate scored up to 81-100%.
In FCT in the
same year 2000, out of 10 male students that sat for the examinations 8 or 80%
scored between 0-40%, 2 or 20% scored 41-80% while nil scored 81-100%. 10
female students sat for the same examinations. 7 or 70% of them scored between
0-40%, 2 or 20% scored 41-80% and 1 or 10% scored 81-100%. .
In another year
2001, i Benue State, out of 16 students that sat for the examinations, 7 or 44%
scored between 0-40%, 7 or 44% scored between 41-80% and 2 or 12% scored
between 81-100%. In the same state in the same year, 12 female students sat for
NECO Oral French examinations, 3 or 25% of them scored between 0-40%, 8 or 67%
scored between 41-80% and 1 or 8% scored between 81-100%.
In FCT in the
same year 2001, a total of 14 male students sat for the same examinations, 2 or
14% of them scored 0-40%, 7 or 50% scored between 41-80% and 5 or 36% scored
81-100%. A total of 17 female students sat for the same examinations in the
same year in FCT, 5 or 29% of them scored between 0-40%, 8 or 47% scored
between 41-80% and 4 or 24% scored between 81-100%.
In the year 2002,
in Benue State, a total of 9 male students sat for NECO Oral French
examinations, 5 or 56% of them scored between 0-40%, 3 or 33% scored between
41-80% and only 1 or 11% candidate scored between 81-100%. 15 female students
sat for the same examinations from this same state, 9 or 60% of them scored
0-40%, 6 or 40% scored between 41 -80% and none of them was able to score up to
81- 100%.
In FCT in the
same year 2002, out of 16 male students that sat for the same examinations, no
candidate scored a low mark of 0-40%, 8 or 50% of the candidates scored between
41 -80% and another 8 or 50% candidates scored the highest mark of between
81-100%.
Research Question 4: Is there any significant difference
in female students’ Oral French performance across the states over the years?
Table 4:
Comparison of female students’ performance in Benue State with female students
in FCT in NECO Oral French examinations in 2900, 2001 and 2002.
Year
|
State
|
No. of Female Students
|
Percent of Female Students
|
Score Range
|
2000
|
Benue
|
8
2
-
|
80
20
-
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
10
|
100
|
|
||
|
FCT
|
7
2
1
|
70
20
10
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
10
|
100
|
|
||
2001
|
Benue
|
3
8
1
|
25
67
8
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
12
|
100
|
|
||
FCT
|
5
8
4
|
29
47
24
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
|
17
|
100
|
|
||
2002
|
Benue
|
9
6
-
|
60
40
-
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
15
|
100
|
|
||
FCT
|
4
3
3
|
40
30
30
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
|
10
|
100
|
|
Table 4 reflects
the comparison of Benue State female students’ performance with FCT female
students’ performance in NECO Oral French examinations during 2000, 2001 and
2002. In 2000, a total of 10 female students sat for the same examinations ¡n
Benue State. 8 or 80% of them scored between 41-80 and none of them scored 81-1
00.
While in FCT, 10
female students sat ‘for the same examinations in the same year. 7 or 70% of
them scored between 0-40%, 2 or 20% scored between 41-80% and 1 or 10% scored
between 81-100%.
12 female
students sat for NECO Oral French examinations in 2001 in Benue State. 3 or 25%
scored between 0-40%, 8 or 67% scored 41- 80%, I or 8% scored between 81-100%.
But in FCT, out of 17 female students that sat for the same NECO Oral French
examination in the same year 2001, 5 or 29% scored 0-40%, 8 or 47% scored
between 41-80%, 4 or 24% scored 81-100%.
In another year
2002, 15 female students sat for NECO Oral French examinations in Benue State.
9 or 60% scored 0-40%, 6 or 40% scored 41- 80% none scored 81-100%. This ¡s
compared with the performance of female students in FCT where a total of 10
female students sat for the same examinations in the same year. 4 or 40 % of
them scored 0-40%, 3 or 30% scored 41-80%, 3 or 30% scored 81-100%.
Research Question
5: Is there any significant difference
in male students’ Oral French performance across the states over the years?
Table 6: Comparison of male students’ performance
¡n Benue State with male students’ performance in FCT in NECO Oral French
examinations in 2000, 2001 and 2002
Year
|
State
|
No. of Male Students
|
Percent of Male Students
|
Score Range
|
2000
|
Benue
|
5
2
-
|
71
29
-
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
7
|
100
|
|
||
FCT
|
8
2
-
|
80
20
-
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
|
10
|
100
|
|
||
2001
|
Benue
|
7
7
2
|
44
44
12
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
16
|
100
|
|
||
FCT
|
2
7
5
|
14
50
36
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
|
14
|
100
|
|
||
2002
|
Benue
|
5
3
1
|
56
33
11
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
9
|
100
|
|
||
FCT
|
-
8
8
|
-
50
50
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
|
16
|
100
|
|
Table 5 is the
comparison of male students’ performance, in NECO Oral French examinations in
Benue State with the FCT male students’ performance in the same examinations in
the years 2000, 2001 and 2002.
In Benue State in
2000, 7 or 100% students sat for the examinations. 5 or 71% scored low marks in
the range of 0-40%, 2 or 29% scored 41- 80% and no student scored up to
81-100%.
In the same year
in FCT a total of 10 or 100% male students sat for the same examination, 8 or
80% scored 0-40%, 2 or 20% scored 41-80%, nil scored up to 81-100%.
In 2001, 16 or
100% male students sat for NECO Oral French examinations in Benue State. 7 or
44% scored 0-40%, equal number of 7 or 44% scored 41-80%, 2 or 12% scored
81-100%. In FCT, the same year, 14 or 100% male students sat for the same
examinations. 2 or 14% scored 0-14%, 7 or 50% scored 41-80% and 5 or 36% scored
81-100%.
While in the year
2002 in Benue State, 9 or 100% sat for NECO Oral French examinations. 5 or 56%
scored 0-40%, 3 or 33% scored 41-80% and only 1 or 11% scored 81-100%.
In contrast, in
FCT during the same year 2002, a total of 16 or 100% male students sat for the
same examinations. No male student scored a low mark of 0-40%, 8 or 50% of the
male students scored 41-80% and the remaining 8 or 50% scored the highest mark
of 81-100%.
Research Question 6: Is there any significant difference
in students’ Oral French performance between the two states over the years?
Table 6:
Difference between Benue State students’ performances and FCT students’
performances in NECO Oral French examination in the year 2000, 2001, and 2002.
|
Benue
State
|
FCT
|
||||
Year
|
No.
|
Percent
|
Score
Range
|
No.
of Students
|
Percent
|
Score
Range
|
2000
|
13
4
-
|
77
23
-
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
15
4
1
|
75
20
5
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
17
|
100
|
|
20
|
100
|
|
|
2001
|
10
15
3
|
36
54
10
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
7
15
9
|
23
48
29
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
28
|
100
|
|
31
|
100
|
|
|
2002
|
14
9
1
|
58
38
4
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
4
11
11
|
15
42
42
|
0-40
41-80
81-100
|
|
24
|
100
|
|
26
|
100
|
|
Table 6 shows the
difference between Benue State students’ performance and FCT students’
performance in NECO Oral French examination in the years 2000, 2001 and 2002.
In 2000, a total
of 17 students or 100% sat for the examinations in Benue State. A greater
number of 13 students or 77 percent scored low marks of between 0-40%, 4 or 23%
students scored 41-80%, none scored 81-100%.
But in FCT in the
same year 2000, a total of 20 or 100% students took the examinations. 15
students or 75% of them scored between 0-40%, 4 or 20% scored 41-80% and I or
5% scored between 8 1-100%.
A total of 28
students or 100% of them sat for NECO Oral French examinations in Benue State
in 2001. 10 or 36% scored between 0-40%, 15 or 54% scored 40-81%, 3 or 10%
scored 81-100%. That same year 2O01, a total of 31 or 100% students sat for the
same examinations in FCT.
7 or 23% of them scored between 0-40%, 15 or 48%
scored 40-81%, 9 or 29% scored 81-100%.
24 or 100% students sat for the oral examinations
En Benue State in 2002. 14 or 58% out of this number scored between 0-40%, 9 or
38% of them scored 41-80%, 1 or 4 scored 81-100%. As compared with FCT in the
same year 2002, where a total of 26 or 10% students sat for the examinations. 4
or 16% of this number scored 0-40%, 11 or 42% of them scored 41-80% and another
11 or 42% scored the highest mark of 81- 100%. .
4.2 HYPOTHESES
Hypothesis 3a: There is no significant
difference in students’ Oral French performance within FCT over the years.
Table 2a:1 ANOVA test of significant difference
in F.C.T. students’ Oral French performance in 2000, 2001, 2002.
Source of Variance
|
DF
|
Mean Square
|
F.ratio (cal.)
|
F-ratio crit
|
Remarks
|
SS
Within
|
62
|
583.66
|
16.0
|
19.5
|
NS
|
SS
Between
|
6
|
9324
|
|
|
|
Total
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
As shown in table 2a.1, the calculated t value of
16.0 with a degree of freedom of 62 was smaller than the critical value of
19.5. This indicates that no significant difference existed in students’ Oral
French performance within FCT between 2000-2002. Therefore, the null hypothesis
is accepted
Hypothesis
2b: There is no significant difference in students’
Oral French performance within Benue state over the years.
Table 2b 1: ANOVA
test of significant difference in Benue State students’ Oral French
performance/scores in 200-2002.
Source of Variance
|
Df
|
Mean Square
|
F-ratio (cal.)
|
F-ratio crit.
|
Remarks
|
SS
Within
|
76
|
514.83
|
5.41
|
19.5
|
NS
|
SS
Between
|
2
|
2787
|
|
|
NS
|
Total
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
From Table 2b.1 above, the calculated t value of
5.41 with a degree of freedom 76, was smaller than the critical value of 19.5.
This indicates that no significant difference existed in students, oral French
performance within Benue State between 2000-2002. Therefore, the null
hypothesis is accepted.
Hypothesis
3: There is no significant difference between male
and female students’ Oral French performance within each state over the years?
Table 3.1: t-Test on gender differences of Benue
and F.C.T students’ performance in NECO Oral French in 2000-2002.
Year
|
State
|
N
|
Male Mean
|
SD
|
Female Mean
|
SD
|
t-Value
|
DF
|
T Critical
|
Remarks
|
2000
|
Benue
FCT
|
15
20
|
30.6
32.9
|
3.82
2.71
|
24.6
31.1
|
3.42
3.02
|
3.18
1.40
|
13
18
|
1.11
1.734
|
S
NS
|
2001
|
Benue
FCT
|
33
26
|
53.8
75.0
|
4.18
5.11
|
46.1
69.14
|
4.49
3.79
|
5.09
3.35
|
31
24
|
1.696
1.79
|
S
S
|
2002
|
Benue
FCT
|
31
30
|
58.8
67.9
|
5.24
4.84
|
42.43
55.3
|
4.85
5.81
|
9.0
2.22
|
29
17
|
1.699
1.740
|
S
S
|
As has been observed above, table 3 reveals the
t-test on gender differences of Benue and FCT students’ performance in NECO
Oral French in thee three years 2000, 2001 and 2002. In the year 2000 in Benue
state,
the t- value of 3.18 is greater than the critical
t-value of 1.11; while in FCT the t-value of 1.40 is less than critical value
of 1.73.
The result on this table reveals that there is a
significant difference between the male and female students with respect to
Oral French performance in Benue State within the year 2000. The null
hypothesis is then rejected. On the other hand, there is no significant
difference between the male and female students as regards performance in Oral
French in FCT. The null hypothesis is accepted.
In the year 2001, the t-value is 5.09, and the
critical t-value is 1.696. The result reveals that there is a significant
difference between the male and female students in Oral French performance
within Benue State during the year 2001. The null hypothesis is rejected.
In the same year, in FCT, the t-value 3.35 is
greater than the critical t-value 1.79. The result indicates that there is
significant difference between the male and the female students in NECO Oral
performance within FCT in the year 2001. The null hypothesis is rejected.
In 2002, in Benue State, the t-value is 9.0 the
degree of freedom is 29 while the critical t-value is 1.699. The t-value is
greater than the critical value. Therefore, there is significant difference in
Benue State students’ performance in NECO Oral French in the year 2002. The
null hypothesis is then rejected.
In FCT in the same year (2002), the t-value,
degree of freedom and the critical t-value are 2.22, 17 and 1.740 respectively.
The calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value. The result shows
that there is a significant difference between male and female students Oral
French performance in FCT in the year 2002. Therefore the hypothesis is
rejected. The t-test results over the three years 2000-2002 indicates that
there were significant differences in NECO performances between male and female
in the two states except for FCT in 2000.
Hypothesis
4: There is no significant difference in female
students’ Oral French performance across the state over the years.
Table 4.1: t-Test of significant differences in
female students’ performance across the states in the years 2000-2002.
|
F.C.T
|
Benue State
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Years
|
No.
|
Mean
|
SD
|
No.
|
Mean
|
SD
|
DF
|
t-Value
|
t-Critical
|
Remarks
|
2000
|
10
|
32.9
|
2.71
|
8
|
30.6
|
3.82
|
16
|
1.746
|
1.49
|
S
|
2001
|
17
|
75.0
|
4.48
|
12
|
46.1
|
4.48
|
27
|
16.00
|
1.703
|
S
|
2002
|
10
|
67.9
|
4.84
|
15
|
58.8
|
5.24
|
23
|
4.38
|
1.714
|
S
|
A statistical analysis of table 4 above indicates
that the degree of freedom is 16, the calculated t-value of 1.746 is greater
than the critical t-value of 1.49. There is significant difference ¡n female
students’ performance in NECO Oral French across the states in 2000. The null
hypothesis is rejected.
Table 4 also indicates that in 2001, the degree
of freedom is 27, the t- value is 16.00 and the critical t is 1.703. The
calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value. The analysis reveals
that there is a significant difference in the female students’ performance
across the states in the year 2001. The null hypothesis is rejected.
In 2002 as shown in table 4, the degree of freedom
is 23, the calculated t-value of 4.38 is greater than the critical t-value of
1.714. There is a significant difference in female students performance across
the states in the year 2002. The null hypothesis is rejected.
Hypothesis
5: There is no significant difference in male
students’ oral French performance across the states over the years.
Table 5.1: t-Test of significant difference in
male students’ performance across the states in the years 200, 2001 and 2002.
|
FCT
|
BENUE STATE
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Years
|
No.
|
Mean
|
SD
|
No.
|
Mean
|
SD
|
t-Value
|
t-Critical
|
DF
|
Remarks
|
2000
|
10
|
31.1
|
3.00
|
7
|
24.6
|
3.34
|
4.15
|
1.753
|
15
|
S
|
2001
|
14
|
69.14
|
3.79
|
16
|
53.8
|
4.18
|
10.46
|
1.701
|
28
|
S
|
2002
|
16
|
55.3
|
5.81
|
9
|
42.43
|
4.85
|
5.90
|
1.714
|
23
|
S
|
Table 5 above shows the t-test of significant difference
in male students’ performance across the states over the years under study. The
critical value is 1.753, the t-value is 4.15 and the degree of freedom is 15.
The calculated t-value is greater than critical t-value. This indicates that
there is a significant difference in the male students Oral French performance
across the states under study ¡n the year 2000. The null hypothesis is then
rejected.
In 2001, the calculated t-value, the critical
t-value and the degree of freedom for their performance are 10.46, 1.701 and 28
respectively. Therefore there is a significant difference in the performance of
male student in FCT and Benue State in NECO Oral French examination in that
year. The null hypothesis is rejected.
While in the year 2002, calculated t-value is
5.90, the critical t-value is 1.714 and the degree of freedom is 23. The
calculate/t-value is greater than the critical t-value. The result reveals a
significant difference in the male students’ Oral French performance across the
state in the year 2002. The hypothesis is therefore rejected.
Hypothesis
6: There is no significant difference in the
students’ Oral French performance between the two states over the years.
Table 6.1: t-Test of significant difference in
students’ Oral French performance between the two states over the years.
|
Benue State
|
FCT
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Years
|
No.
|
Mean
|
SD
|
No.
|
Mean
|
SD
|
DF
|
t-Value
|
t-Critical
|
Remarks
|
2000
|
19
|
32.0
|
2.85
|
15
|
27.8
|
3.61
|
32
|
3.80
|
1.69
|
S
|
2001
|
33
|
71.8
|
4.51
|
26
|
49.8
|
4.36
|
57
|
18.7
|
1.671
|
S
|
2002
|
31
|
61.7
|
5.19
|
19
|
48.5
|
5.33
|
48
|
8.71
|
1.676
|
S
|
From table 6 above, it is observed that ¡n the
year 2000 ¡n Benue State, The calculated t-value of 3.80 is greater than the
critical t-value of 1.69 at 32 degree of freedom. This shows that there is
significant difference in students’ performance across the two states in the
year 2000. The hypothesis is rejected.
In 2001, the degree of freedom is 57 in both states. The
calculated t- value of 18.7 is greater than the critical t-value of 1.671 at
0.05 level of significance. This means that there is a significant difference
in students’ performance across the two states in 2Ò01. Therefore the
hypothesis is rejected.
In the year 2002, in Benue State, the calculated
t-value of 8.71 is greater than the critical t-value of 1.676 at 48 degrees of
freedom at 0.05 level of significance. There is significant difference in
students’ performance across the two states in 2002. The null hypothesis is
then rejected.
4.3 Discussion
A t-test is used to test the hypotheses in
numbers 4, 5, 6, 7, to find out the
significance differences in the students’ Oral French performance in Benue State and FCT. In hypothesis 3a
and 3b, ANOVA is used to test the hypothesis.
In testing the hypotheses, the null hypotheses Ho
and the alternate hypotheses Ha are
stated. The significant level is at 0.05 and the value of the test statistics is calculated. The critical-t for observed
data is also found with a degree of
freedom.
In tables 1 and 2, a formal statistical analysis
of the data indicates the students’
oral French performance in FCT and Benue State. In table 1, students performed better in FCT (1894 or 74.39%) in the year
2002; while in table 2 in Benue
State, the students scored higher with a total score of 1645 or 99.93% in 2001. FCT students’ good performance in 2002 may
be attributed to their improved
interest in the learning of French Language, their privilege of being in Abuja, friendly environment their
nearness to ECOWAS Secretariat
Headquarter and French Embassy, motivation and their need for French language after their graduation - FCT being
the centre of international
activities in Nigeria. On the other hand, Benue State better performance in 2001 could be because of their interest and
aptitude for French language. The
method used in teaching them French may also be a contributing factor.
In tables 3.la and 3.lb, the result of the ANOVA
test reveals that there is no significant difference in the students’
performance within each state in the
years 2000, 2001 and 2002. The reasons could be the uniformity with which the French embassy treats the states. This
can be seen in the workshops and
seminars organized by the French Embassy,
Centre for French Teaching and Documentation (CFTD) for French teachers and students. In addition,
oversea scholarships, books and instructional materials were distributed to
pilot schools in each state of the Federation. Also, the presence of French
Centres in each geographical zone of the country is a big asset.
In table 4 and 4.1, the result of the t-test on
gender differences in Benue State and FCT students’ performance in NECO Oral
French in the years 2000, 2001 and 2002 shows that there is a significant
difference in some cases while there is no significant difference in others.
The expectation that female students may be more proficient in French than male
students was contrary to what obtains in table 4. The male students performed
better than the female students in Benue State and FCT in the years 2000, 2001
and 2002. The present day male students’ desire to become journalists,
diplomats and international businessmen must have accounted for these high
scores and enrolment by boys. This higher number of male candidates that sat
for the examination shows that boys are more interested in the French language.
This in turn has a bearing on their oral performance.
Also, in table 4, it is observed that the female
students’ poor performance in both states may be as a result of their subject
choice, parental influence, lack of flair and interest for the French language.
In other words, their future career affects their interest and aptitude for
French language. Despite their supposed natural affiliation/inclination toward
language learning, female candidates are out performed by their male
counterparts.
The results of our study on tables 5 and 5.1, 6 and
6.1 of the t-test significances in female and male students’ performance across
the states in the year 2001 and 2002 respectively indicate that there is a
significant difference in all. It also indicates that the FCT female and male
students’ mean scores are higher than those of Benue State. This in actual
sense suggests the cosmopolitan nature of Abuja and the presence of qualified
dedicated French teachers. The effect of this location could play a significant
role in the individual differences. In view of these findings, it may be
possible to draw the conclusion that the examination condition is not the same.
FCT is a Federal Capital Territory of a country while Benue State is a local
territory.
In table 7 and 7, 1 however, the mean scores of
the Benue State students’ Oral French performance is higher than those of FCT.
Post a Comment